By James O’BrienPosted May 04, 2018 07:17:47It seems to me that the greatest impediment to the use of social media for real-world communication is its inability to filter out what is true, and what is not true, by a process of selective reading.

The truth, and especially the truth of things that have been true, has become so embedded in social media that it is difficult for anyone to get it out of their minds.

This is because social media platforms have no idea what their audience is going to want or what they need from them.

The same goes for the truth.

We are so accustomed to reading the headlines of newspapers and magazines and television news broadcasts, we are accustomed to the fact that the media has a certain “balance of opinion,” but that is just a convenient myth.

When a story is presented with no counterpoint or rebuttal, people will interpret it as fact and take it as true.

And this is why the social media giants are now being called on to correct misinformation by “re-framing” the content to make it fit the audience’s interests and expectations.

This, of course, does not mean that social media sites must always present the most accurate information.

The fact that they have become the “gatekeepers” of truth is a good thing.

But we should not forget that this is what happened when newspapers and television stations were censoring information from sources like the United States government and the Catholic Church.

The problem is that the information they have censored is often false.

They may be true in some respects, but their accuracy has been degraded by what is now a new type of filtering technology.

A new type: selective readingThis is not a new phenomenon.

It has been around for decades.

As an early example, we can trace the idea back to the time when newspapers first started to print factoids about World War I, such as “the British were massacred” and “the First World War was fought with the aid of chemical weapons.”

In this way, the information that was being censored in print was no longer fact, but was instead presented as fact-free information, and thus not useful to the public.

The first major example of selective re-framings of information came in the 1920s, when newspapers were forced to publish factoids on the role of religion in the war.

The result was that most people didn’t know the truth about the war, and therefore their belief in a godless world was not based on fact.

This selective retelling of the truth was the most common way that misinformation could be propagated on the internet.

The internet also has a long history of creating a false sense of legitimacy for itself, with the rise of the so-called “alternative facts” movement.

The use of this tactic by the news media to get the truth out has grown steadily since the 1970s.

In this respect, the selective rewinding of information is similar to the way that the internet was designed to allow the spread of misinformation.

It was originally intended to help news outlets spread accurate information about politics and history.

But this has become increasingly common as the internet has become the dominant means of information dissemination.

The irony is that a technology that was designed for information dissemination can become the source of misinformation and disinformation.

This is because selective reworking of the information can lead to the misleading perception that it has a more accurate or objective tone than the truth, when in fact it does not.

As the technology becomes increasingly prevalent, the ability of the news organizations to keep accurate information out of the public’s hands becomes less likely, and more and more people will be exposed to false information that has been manipulated to suit the purposes of the media.

This process of mass media propaganda is the source for the spread and adoption of misinformation by governments, corporations, and even individuals.

When information is censored, we have lost the ability to decide whether we want to believe it, because we are now not in control of the process.

In other words, we no longer have any control over what information is presented to us.

We can learn from this, and we can also do better.

The best way to prevent misinformation is to educate ourselves about the sources of information we receive.

We need to become more aware of what we are being presented with.

This requires us to be open to alternative sources of news.

We should also do our best to avoid selective rereading of information.

For example, it is true that most journalists do not like to use sources that have not been verified.

But when news outlets have been caught doing this, the practice of selective-reading has been outlawed.

This means that journalists are no longer allowed to reread the news stories that they are already familiar with, and they must instead use sources they have read previously.

The practice of the selective reading of news is a form of censorship, and this is exactly what is being called for by social